Discuss Alternative Evidence to Bennett levy and Marteaus interrogation. on that point is alternative testify to that of Bennett levy and Marteaus enquiry, there ar three examples of this: Rapid learning Seligman effectuate that 2-4 shocks where enough to gain a phobia by linking the shocks to a picture to a snake or spider this is known as move in instruct. He pitch that larger shocks where required to create the render type of phobia towards a picture of a flower. The research from Bennett charge and Marteaus research was very different from this because they show that it was the way the animal looked or moved that created fear of the animal, whereas Seligman support unmingled teach and got the participant to associate the picture with the bad feeling (shock). The second example would be: Extinction Ãhman make that fears towards a stimulus such as houses or flowers became dead when it was no longer polar with a shock, and instead the fears b ecame polar with stimuluss such as spiders or snakes, this secern is not similar to Bennett and Marteaus, however it does link into the evidence from Seligmans research as they both talk about simple conditioning and the association between the stimulus and the shock.

The third is called Contrapreparedness, McNally and Reiss demonstrate that associations with the FR stimulus are not likely to be learnt, but conditioned. There is an association between the FR stimuli (picture of a spider), or FI stimuli (picture of a flower) with a safety signal, (absence of a shock), if the conditioning was successful than the person give be relieved when they do not f! eel the shock, so therefore eventually they give have no need to fear the stimulus. This is different from Bennett charges and Martueaus study as it does not utilise the idea of classical conditioning but it does link into that of Seligman.If you get to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment